Told us about a post-Assad Syria

I challenge that provides me with an Arab leader and one of those who are looking with the Americans and Europeans, day and night in the future of Syria after the fall of the regime of President Bashar al-Assad, a clear picture of this future, and will look the country, so do not be surprised or taken aback is the same for later, or even Nhasabh on his program and his views and efforts of these.
Just as the Arab leaders, members of the Damascus gathering, which was founded as an alternative to the Arab League, such as the U.S. invasion of Iraq, misguided enthusiasm for the project in the U.S. to attack Iraq and destroy it, not surprised they finish with the same to the end of the day is coming.
One hundred years ago almost came delegate of Great Britain, Mr. McMahon to Sharif of Mecca, Hussein bin Ali, offering him the revolution, the son of the Hashemite dynasty, against the Ottoman Empire's Arab, promising him of empire purely Arab race, ancestry, based modernity and development, and away from the legacy of the Ottoman Empire corrupt and backward .
Revolution started from the Hijaz, and Athar spot where the (Mecca), and was the formation of 'Arab Legion' for the participation of British and French war to topple the Sunni Muslim Ottoman Empire, and the liberalization of Arab colonization.
War ended with the fall of the Ottoman Empire indeed, break up soil, and the creation of new states, and was notable that most of the new entities was liberated, including modern Turkey, except for the Arab countries that have been placed under Alantdaben British and French, including Palestine, which was given later to the Jews, and the rest of the story known .
We live these days over again, and in other ways, the scenario itself, Western countries led by the United States, demanding the Sunni Arab revolt, the injustice and tyranny, and Thacdhm to war later with Shiite Iran, and focuses its support for these revolutions in the countries addressed by the project's western, and especially Libya, Syria and Iraq and Yemen, and to a lesser extent.
Arab revolts against injustice, corruption and illegal inheritance, but say it's delayed too much, but what we fear, but what we see with our eyes, the recruitment is innocent of these revolutions, to serve the interests of the Western colonial purposes only.
Systems will fall inevitably, the system of Syria will not be an exception, there are hundreds of systems ruled Syria for eight thousand years, but what matters is Syria in particular and the region in general, and the image that will be it, and the size of the massacres will face its own people, if the number has now stopped at twenty thousand, when any number counter will stop after two months or two years or twenty years?
'' '
Flow of weapons to Syria, the regime and the opposition at the same time, modern and sophisticated weapons not seen in the Arab wars against Israel. Obama yesterday signed a decision to allow U.S. intelligence agencies supporting the opposition and Syrian forces on the ground, and was reported on the arrival of a battalion U.S. to train the Jordanian army on how to defend himself in the face of any 'attack' Suri, The report of the Royal Institute for Security Studies British about the presence of U.S. special forces and British on the ground, the Syrian, to support the opposition and its forces and carry out acts of espionage and information gathering. He stressed that the British warships on their way to the Syrian coast in preparation for the evacuation of British nationals and foreigners (report exists to our website).
The Russians and Chinese also support the system, and four warships heading to the Russian base in Tartus the present time, and Turkish forces conducting maneuvers and strengthen its presence on the Syrian border.
This means that a regional war and perhaps an international on the ground, the Syrian is imminent, but the tools of Arab and Arab victims. Jordan ended the state of neutrality towards the situation in Syria, he decided to join the military effort Gulf west to bring down the system, clashes took place effectively between his forces and other Syria, may be the beginning of a military invasion, and we have to remember that the U.S. forces that stormed Baghdad was coming across Jordanian territory.
I live in the West 35 years ago, I learned and taught and lectured in most of its universities, and wrote articles on the Middle East in the newspapers, and co-interlocutor in most if not all of his television stations, as well as hundreds of conferences, seminars, political, and came out of all of this firm conviction that there are no policies random, and that the policy and war strategy be developed on the basis of action and careful planning, not on the basis of the reactions, and that there is an established fact in most Western experts that the Arabs are easy Khaddiathm and the exploitation of vulnerabilities, and dissemination of the band, including, on the basis of sectarian and ethnic lines, is sufficient to note that the most important Faculty at the University of London School of Oriental and African Studies, was founded in order to study the Arab tribes and ethnic groups, and the preparation of the English rulers of the Arab colonies.
Decision to invade and occupy Iraq was taken the year two thousand officially, and were given instructions to make plans preparation and implementation in 2001, ie after the events of atheist th of September, but the neo-conservatives, most of them Jews loyal to Israel, paved for this decision five years earlier, and called for regime change Iraq as a threat to Israel.
People who were raised against dictatorship and tyranny, revolutions were spontaneous and legitimate for the most part, but the West is trying to try and ride these revolutions and using them to his advantage in the acquisition of oil wealth, and weaken the Arabs in general and their danger to Israel.
Tony Blair and the argument view of neo-colonialism and British Prime Minister about the former 'controlled change' Arab spring is still fresh to mind.
'' '
In 1979, after the success of the Iranian revolution, overthrow the Shah of Iran, the British historian Bernard Lewis Zionist set of recommendations for Western countries advise them how to respond to the loss of Iran, a strong ally. Summary of these recommendations is to work on the 'Balkanization' of parts of the Middle East through the promotion of ethnic minorities and religious to revolt to demand their own independent entities, creating a crescent of crisis. In this way, the powerful states coherent anti-Western, such as Iraq and Syria, are being dismantled from the inside, and turn into small weak states (Ministate) conflicting with each other.
In 1934 and developed a French mandate authorities plan similar to the division of Syria into five countries, on the basis of sectarian sectarian and ethnic lines, two Snetan in Aleppo and Damascus, and one Druze in Jabal Al-Arab (Druze previously) and a fourth upper coast (Tartus and Latakia) and a fifth Turkmen in the District of Iskenderun. This plan failed because the Syrian people rejected them and resisted to preserve the unity of the geographic and demographic homeland.
After eighty years back this chart to reared its head again, as Syria faces fragmentation in practice, everything in Syria these days fragmented or divided, power is divided and corroded, territorial integrity fragmented, opposition fragmented and divided, nothing common at all, and it seems that the tips Bernard Lewis began to see the light, and plans are continuing fragmentation, Vhalb almost be isolated, and semi-autonomous Kurdish north, and Damascus, isolated, and the road is not safe to Latakia, and Homs rebel on the system. In Libya, Cyrenaica was preparing to secede, and some of its people want to switch to chiefdom Gulf emirates or the other, enjoy Bnaftha isolation from Tripoli and Fezzan, and the state of Iraq is known to all. Did not Bernard Lewis that Iraq is an artificial knee and Britain should be divided along ethnic and sectarian lines before the last war?
We do not know whether the other Arab states like Egypt and Saudi Arabia, Algeria and Morocco (exclude Sudan because it is fragmented, and Yemen on the way) are aware that this scheme will inevitably it? Who would have imagined that the Syrian regime who supported the war on Iraq under the title of the liberation of Kuwait rewarded in this way?
The question we ask on the Arab countries that participate enthusiastically in the alliance's friends Syria, and Libya accepted by friends, whether familiar with the intentions of the Western region and its future, and how it will be after ten years or twenty years at least? Is the West briefed her on all the details?
Talking about post-Assad era, do they have a political and geographical maps and projects to rebuild this country, for example, or any other, is Saudi Arabia has very clear vision for Syria but for the Kingdom itself?
We want a single Arab leader to convince us that the Arabs are real partners in shaping the future of their region, and that reassures us that we will find ourselves facing a deception by others, such as those we faced us or our ancestors after the Great Arab Revolt, or after the occupation of Iraq and the destruction of Libya.
Ask these questions to clear my care, and until he finds a young researcher in the future that there were books and warned commented bell, and all the Arabs were not misled and are walking in the passenger plans and divided Fathm eyes open. It is my testimony of history.Abdel Bari Atwan